M

Chanel Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu vs Elizabeth Taylor White Diamonds en Rouge

Chanel Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu and Elizabeth Taylor White Diamonds en Rouge compared side by side: accords, longevity, sillage and value, so you can pick with confidence.

88% alikevs
White Diamonds en RougeElizabeth Taylor20194.1★

The difference in plain words

Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu and White Diamonds en Rouge are very similar; both have Rose, Jasmine and Patchouli. Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu leans more citrus, while White Diamonds en Rouge leans sweet. White Diamonds en Rouge projects more; it gets better value-for-money votes.

Longer lastingAbout the same
Stronger projectionWhite Diamonds en Rouge
Better perceived valueWhite Diamonds en Rouge
More of a night scentWhite Diamonds en Rouge

Accords

?
AccordA blend of notes the nose perceives as one unified smell - like a chord made of musical notes.More in Learn →
● Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu ● White Diamonds en Rouge
RoseWoodyPatchouliFruityEarthyVanillaSweetCitrus
Both share: Rose · Jasmine · Patchouli · Vanilla · Vetiver
Only in Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu: Lychee · Grapefruit
Only in White Diamonds en Rouge: Pink Pepper · Raspberry · Orange Blossom · Amber

Community votes

Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu ← · → White Diamonds en Rouge
Time of day
day
night
Season
spring
summer
fall
winter
Value
way overpriced
overpriced
ok
good value
great value
Sillage
intimate
moderate
strong
enormous
Longevity
very weak
weak
moderate
long lasting
eternal
Gender
female
more female
unisex
more male
male

Metrics

0–100, with delta
Longevity
?
LongevityHow long a fragrance lasts on skin.More in Learn →
Coco Mademoiselle Crush Absolu +3
65
62
Sillage / projection
?
ProjectionHow far the scent radiates from your skin while you stand still. The 'sillage / projection' votes on fragrance pages blend the two, so read them as overall reach.More in Learn →
White Diamonds en Rouge +11
43
54
Price valueWhite Diamonds en Rouge +46
36
82
Night-nessWhite Diamonds en Rouge +9
46
55
Gender lean (♀→♂)
Feminine
Masculine