M

Carolina Herrera CH Men Sport vs Thin Wild Mercury Zuma 1975

Carolina Herrera CH Men Sport and Thin Wild Mercury Zuma 1975 compared side by side: accords, longevity, sillage and value, so you can pick with confidence.

CH Men SportCarolina Herrera20123.6★
84% alikevs
Zuma 1975Thin Wild Mercury20194.0★

The difference in plain words

CH Men Sport and Zuma 1975 are very similar; both have Bergamot, Sea Notes and Vetiver. CH Men Sport leans more earthy.

Longer lastingCH Men Sport
Stronger projectionCH Men Sport
Better perceived valueCH Men Sport
More of a night scentAbout the same

Accords

?
AccordA blend of notes the nose perceives as one unified smell - like a chord made of musical notes.More in Learn →
● CH Men Sport ● Zuma 1975
AromaticWoodyCitrusFresh SpicyMarineEarthyHerbalSoft Spicy
Both share: Bergamot · Sea Notes · Vetiver · Sandalwood
Only in CH Men Sport: Grapefruit · Sage · Juniper · Sichuan Pepper · Oakmoss
Only in Zuma 1975: Coriander · Jasmine Sambac · Ambrette (Musk Mallow)

Community votes

CH Men Sport ← · → Zuma 1975
Time of day
day
night
Season
spring
summer
fall
winter
Value
way overpriced
overpriced
ok
good value
great value
Not enough votes for the right fragrance here.
Sillage
intimate
moderate
strong
enormous
Not enough votes for the right fragrance here.
Longevity
very weak
weak
moderate
long lasting
eternal
Not enough votes for the right fragrance here.
Gender
female
unisex
more male
male
Not enough votes for the right fragrance here.

Metrics

0–100, with delta
Longevity
?
LongevityHow long a fragrance lasts on skin.More in Learn →
CH Men Sport +59
59
0
Sillage / projection
?
ProjectionHow far the scent radiates from your skin while you stand still. The 'sillage / projection' votes on fragrance pages blend the two, so read them as overall reach.More in Learn →
CH Men Sport +39
39
0
Price valueCH Men Sport +58
58
0
Night-ness≈ even
17
16
Gender lean (♀→♂)
Feminine
Masculine